Re: A stray mention of "conformance" in SC 4.1.1

I also agree with the proposed fix. The note has the same meaning when
deleting "conformance to".
Loïc


On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>wrote:

> I agree with the method of fixing the note. Removing 'conformance to'
> doesn't change the meaning of the statement.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mary Jo Mueller
> IBM Research â–º Human Ability & Accessibility Center
> 11501 Burnet Road, Bldg. 904 Office 5D017, Austin, Texas 78758
> 512-286-9698 T/L 363-9698 *
> **maryjom@us.ibm.com* <hnielsen@us.ibm.com>
>
> *www.ibm.com/able* <http://www.ibm.com/able> and *w3.ibm.com/able*<http://w3.ibm.com/able>
> *
> **IBM Accessibility* <http://www.facebook.com/IBMAccessibility> on
> Facebook â–¼ *IBMAccess* <http://twitter.com/IBMAccess> on Twitter â–¼ *IBM
> Accessibility* <http://www.linkedin.com/e/vgh/2419815/> on LinkedIn*
> “If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and
> become more, you are a leader.”  ~ John Quincy Adams*
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Peter Korn ---07/10/2013 02:29:41
> PM---Hi gang, Staring at our latest draft, I noticed a stray refere]Peter
> Korn ---07/10/2013 02:29:41 PM---Hi gang, Staring at our latest draft, I
> noticed a stray reference to
>
> From: Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com>
> To: "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>,
> Date: 07/10/2013 02:29 PM
> Subject: A stray mention of "conformance" in SC 4.1.1
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi gang,
>
> Staring at our latest draft, I noticed a stray reference to "conformance"
> in *4.1.1 Parsing*<http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wcag2ict/#ensure-compat-parses>.
> The reference is in our first Note:
>
>
>    *Note: *Markup is not always available to assistive technologies or to
>    user selectable user agents such as browsers.  Software sometimes uses
>    markup languages internally for persistence of the software user interface,
>    in ways where the markup is never available to assistive technology (either
>    directly or through a document object model (DOM)), or to a user agent
>    (such as a browser). In such cases, *conformance *to this provision
>    would have no impact on accessibility as it can have for web content where
>    it is exposed.
>
>
>
> I am NOT suggesting we try to fix this before publication tomorrow.  But
> for our FINAL draft, I think we can simply delete "conformance to" from
> that sentence, so the last sentence would read: " In such cases, this
> provision would have no impact on accessibility as it can have for web
> content where it is exposed."
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> Peter
> -- *
> *[image: Oracle] <http://www.oracle.com/>
> Peter Korn | Accessibility Principal
> Phone: *+1 650 5069522* <+1%20650%205069522>
> 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065 *
> *[image: Green Oracle] <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>Oracle is
> committed to developing practices and products that help protect the
> environment
>
>


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Loïc Martínez-Normand
DLSIIS. Facultad de Informática
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Campus de Montegancedo
28660 Boadilla del Monte
Madrid
---------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: loic@fi.upm.es
tfno: +34 91 336 74 11
---------------------------------------------------------------