Andi,
It is not clear to me how the text crosses to policy statement versus a note when applying the WCAG outside of intended context. It sounds like a practical set of note to help people figure out how to delineate who can realistically take control of which portion in meeting an SC. I understand that we are all in new territory here and would be glad to adjust. In any case, a clearer set of rules would be helpful.
All best,
Alex
From: Andi Snow-Weaver [mailto:andisnow@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 8:46 AM
To: Alex Li
Cc: public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org
Subject: Re: 1.2.4 Action item
Alex,
This seems like a policy statement which would be out of scope for WCAG?
Andi
[cid:image001.gif@01CD4A14.D3533760]
[IBM Research]
Andi Snow-Weaver
Accessibility Standards Program Manager
Human Ability & Accessibility Center
Tel: +1-720-663-2789
Email: andisnow@us.ibm.com<mailto:andisnow@us.ibm.com>
[cid:image001.gif@01CD4A14.D3533760]
[Inactive hide details for Alex Li ---06/12/2012 09:19:24 AM---Here's my note: Call participants are content providers for call]Alex Li ---06/12/2012 09:19:24 AM---Here's my note: Call participants are content providers for call functionality between two or more p
From: Alex Li <alli@microsoft.com<mailto:alli@microsoft.com>>
To: "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org<mailto:public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org<mailto:public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>>
Date: 06/12/2012 09:19 AM
Subject: 1.2.4 Action item
________________________________
Here’s my note:
Call participants are content providers for call functionality between two or more people. Thus, the participants are responsible for arranging captions where appropriate. This SC does not imply that all calls require captioning or rely services regardless of needs.
Alex Li
Senior Strategist
Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Group
email: alli@microsoft.com<mailto:alli@microsoft.com>
phone: +1 (425)538-7984
mobile: +1 (206) 778-4202
Microsoft Corporation<http://microsoft.com/>
