Re: SC-by-SC analysis of UI Context [was Re: User Interface Context]

On Jul 13, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Peter Korn wrote:

> Gregg,
> 
> 
>>> <PK>
>>> Gregg, in your e-mail below you wrote that you guys did new proposals for 2.4.6 and 3.1.2.  Neither of those mention "web page", nor did I see anything new there.  Did you mean those SCs or other ones?
>> 
>> 
>> GV: 2.4.6 is a typo of some sort since 2.4.6 is already a closed item.
>> I can't find any other open item so...   just ignore it.   don't know what would go in its place. 
>> 
>> 
>> 3.1.2  - there is a new proposal #4
> 
> PK: Sorry, I missed it.  Didn't see "web page" in the SC, and when I scanned for "User Interface Context", I didn't make it through the Note to see it there toward the end.  I don't see how this is an improvement.  Why not just say "...it can be assumed that all TEXT within that document or USER INTERFACE ELEMENTS with that application will be using the same language unless it is indicated"?  Since we only care about the text of the UI elements, we could even simplify further to: "...it can be assumed that all TEXT within that document or application will be using the same language unless it is indicated"

GV2:  that is just a note and the words used there are not important.   Just using terms consistently.     You could use "parts" there and it would work as well.   

GV2:  the key here is the paragraph above that.   


> 
> 
> Peter
> 
> -- 
> <oracle_sig_logo.gif>
> Peter Korn | Accessibility Principal
> Phone: +1 650 5069522 
> 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065 
> <green-for-email-sig_0.gif> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment
> 
>