Re: SC-by-SC analysis of UI Context [was Re: User Interface Context]

Gregg,


>> <PK>
>> Gregg, in your e-mail below you wrote that you guys did new proposals 
>> for 2.4.6 and 3.1.2.  Neither of those mention "web page", nor did I 
>> see anything new there.  Did you mean those SCs or other ones?
>
>
> GV: 2.4.6 is a typo of some sort since 2.4.6 is already a closed item.
> I can't find any other open item so...   just ignore it. don't know 
> what would go in its place.
>
>
> 3.1.2  - there is a new proposal #4

PK: Sorry, I missed it.  Didn't see "web page" in the SC, and when I 
scanned for "User Interface Context", I didn't make it through the Note 
to see it there toward the end.  I don't see how this is an 
improvement.  Why not just say "...it can be assumed that all TEXT 
within that document or USER INTERFACE ELEMENTS with that application 
will be using the same language unless it is indicated"?  Since we only 
care about the text of the UI elements, we could even simplify further 
to: "...it can be assumed that all TEXT within that document or 
application will be using the same language unless it is indicated"


Peter

-- 
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Peter Korn | Accessibility Principal
Phone: +1 650 5069522 <tel:+1%20650%205069522>
500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065
Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to 
developing practices and products that help protect the environment

Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 02:25:58 UTC