- From: Bailey, Bruce <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:02:59 +0000
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "Hoffman, Allen" <Allen.Hoffman@HQ.DHS.GOV>, Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com>
- CC: "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
> Web page == User Interface Context == set of ... > Web pages == User Interface Contexts == sets of ... > Web page within a set of Web pages == User Interface Context within a set of User Interface Contexts > That is why we suggested using "product" for the "set of User Interface Contexts" because that is what the set is. So: Web page within a set of Web pages == User Interface Context within a product == set of ... within a set of sets of ... And: multiple Web pages within a set of Web pages == multiple User Interface Contexts within a product == multiple sets of ... within a set of sets of ... With the simpler definition, this WAS feeling more workable to me, even with the set of sets. (With my previous email, I think I was making the plural form more complicated than it needed to be.) BUT as I tried to do the repeated substitutions, I notice that the simpler definition has a BIG problem! User Interface Context == set of user interface elements and the presented information within a product that can be accessed using only navigation commands. But a "product" is a "set of User Interface Contexts" so the simpler definition is self-referential: User Interface Context == set of user interface elements and the presented information within a set of User Interface Contexts that can be accessed using only navigation commands. (On a side note, I agree with Andi's concern that "product" seems too COTS oriented. Can we substitute "product or service" for "product" -- assuming we find a way out the recursive loop?)
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2012 15:03:40 UTC