Re: more checking of draft

yes I agree with that

Gregg
--------------------------------------------------------
Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Director Trace R&D Center
Professor Industrial & Systems Engineering
and Biomedical Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison
Technical Director - Cloud4all Project - http://Cloud4all.info
Co-Director, Raising the Floor - International - http://Raisingthefloor.org
and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure Project -  http://GPII.net

On Dec 4, 2012, at 9:54 AM, Andrea Snow-Weaver <asnowweaver@gmail.com> wrote:

> Gregg,
> 
> I noticed this too so we discussed it at this morning's meeting. We thought that saying "non-web documents within a set of non-web documents" every where was a little cumbersome so we settled on adding the non-web adjective only in set of documents. So it will read "documents within a set of non-web documents".
> 
> You can see the minutes for the discussion once Mary Jo publishes them.
> 
> Andi
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote:
> I think all documents should be  'non-web documents'.
> Gregg
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
> Director Trace R&D Center
> Professor Industrial & Systems Engineering
> and Biomedical Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison
> Technical Director - Cloud4all Project - http://Cloud4all.info
> Co-Director, Raising the Floor - International - http://Raisingthefloor.org
> and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure Project -  http://GPII.net
> 
> On Dec 4, 2012, at 8:46 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> 
>> Perhaps there’s a good reason which I’ve forgot... just checking to ensure insure in 2.4.5 we want to say “documents” rather than “non-web documents”
>>  
>> Cheers
>> David MacDonald
>>  
>> CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
>>   Adapting the web to all users
>>             Including those with disabilities
>> www.Can-Adapt.com
>>  
> 
>