- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:08:12 -0600
- To: "'Sofia Celic'" <Sofia.Celic@visionaustralia.org>, "'Andi Snow-Weaver'" <andisnow@us.ibm.com>, <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
Grin This is one where the distraction provision is combined with the 'time to read it' provision. Hence it's location under a guideline that is focused just on 'time to read it'. Interesting. Do we create another 'distraction' guideline separately that reads like the "background sound" provision? Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sofia Celic > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 4:26 AM > To: Gregg Vanderheiden; Andi Snow-Weaver; public-wcag-teamc@w3.org > Subject: RE: Spam: RE: 1169 ready for Team C review > > > Does the context of the Guideline provide a scope of > non-decorative content? > > The guideline is "Allow users to control time limits on their > reading or interaction". Is the user's reading and > interaction deemed to include decorative content? > > Sofia > > ________________________________ > > From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu] > Sent: Mon 19/02/2007 5:19 PM > To: Sofia Celic; 'Andi Snow-Weaver'; public-wcag-teamc@w3.org > Subject: Spam: RE: 1169 ready for Team C review > > > > It would be required to restart everything else but not decorative. > Its hard to figure out how to do that without getting complicated. > > Stop all. Restart all non-decorative. (any 3 second exception here?) > > > Gregg > -- ------------------------------ > Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org > > [mailto:public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sofia Celic > > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 12:05 AM > > To: Andi Snow-Weaver; public-wcag-teamc@w3.org > > Subject: RE: 1169 ready for Team C review > > > > > > > > I'm not sure about this one. If " it is not required to provide a > > mechanism to restart the movement to conform to this > Success Criterion > > " > > then we shouldn't use a word that suggests this requirement > in the SC. > > > > How about we say something like: > > "Content can be stopped, and restarted as necessary, by the user > > unless the timing or movement is part of an activity where > timing or > > movement is essential" > > > > Sofia > > > > ____________________________ > > > > Dr Sofia Celic > > Assistant Manager Online Accessibility & Senior Web Accessibility > > Consultant Vision Australia - Accessible Information Solutions > > 454 Glenferrie Road > > Kooyong, Victoria, 3144 > > P: +61 (0)3 9864 9284 > > F: +61 (0)3 9864 9370 > > E-mail: Sofia.Celic@visionaustralia.org.au > > www.visionaustralia.org.au > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org > > [mailto:public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andi > > Snow-Weaver > > Sent: Saturday, 17 February 2007 7:23 AM > > To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org > > Subject: 1169 ready for Team C review > > > > > > > > Per my action item yesterday, I have modified 1169. The > agenda section > > on the Team C page doesn't look current so I'm not sure > what process > > you guys are using now. But we should discuss this one on Monday. > > > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_indivi > > dual.php?i > > d=1169 > > > > Andi > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > << ella for Spam Control >> has removed 492 Spam messages and set > > aside > > 207 Later for me > > You can use it too - and it's FREE! www.ellaforspam.com > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 19 February 2007 15:08:42 UTC