- From: Sofia Celic <Sofia.Celic@visionaustralia.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:25:58 +1100
- To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "Andi Snow-Weaver" <andisnow@us.ibm.com>, <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
Does the context of the Guideline provide a scope of non-decorative content? The guideline is "Allow users to control time limits on their reading or interaction". Is the user's reading and interaction deemed to include decorative content? Sofia ________________________________ From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu] Sent: Mon 19/02/2007 5:19 PM To: Sofia Celic; 'Andi Snow-Weaver'; public-wcag-teamc@w3.org Subject: Spam: RE: 1169 ready for Team C review It would be required to restart everything else but not decorative. Its hard to figure out how to do that without getting complicated. Stop all. Restart all non-decorative. (any 3 second exception here?) Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sofia Celic > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 12:05 AM > To: Andi Snow-Weaver; public-wcag-teamc@w3.org > Subject: RE: 1169 ready for Team C review > > > > I'm not sure about this one. If " it is not required to > provide a mechanism to restart the movement to conform to > this Success Criterion " > then we shouldn't use a word that suggests this requirement in the SC. > > How about we say something like: > "Content can be stopped, and restarted as necessary, by the > user unless the timing or movement is part of an activity > where timing or movement is essential" > > Sofia > > ____________________________ > > Dr Sofia Celic > Assistant Manager Online Accessibility > & Senior Web Accessibility Consultant > Vision Australia - Accessible Information Solutions > 454 Glenferrie Road > Kooyong, Victoria, 3144 > P: +61 (0)3 9864 9284 > F: +61 (0)3 9864 9370 > E-mail: Sofia.Celic@visionaustralia.org.au > www.visionaustralia.org.au > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andi > Snow-Weaver > Sent: Saturday, 17 February 2007 7:23 AM > To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org > Subject: 1169 ready for Team C review > > > > Per my action item yesterday, I have modified 1169. The > agenda section on the Team C page doesn't look current so I'm > not sure what process you guys are using now. But we should > discuss this one on Monday. > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_indivi > dual.php?i > d=1169 > > Andi > > > > > > ________________________________ > > << ella for Spam Control >> has removed 492 Spam messages and > set aside > 207 Later for me > You can use it too - and it's FREE! www.ellaforspam.com > >
Received on Monday, 19 February 2007 10:26:48 UTC