- From: Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:00:23 -0600
- To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
We have 9 total issues on time-limits. LC-1046 - I have prepared a resolution on this. Please review and help me think of an example for 2.2.3 of a moving content that cannot be paused because timing or movement is essential. LC-1048 is a level change. Where are we on the level changes? Changed this one to [HOLD] for now. LC-1088 - comments say this one should be on hold so I changed it to [HOLD] LC-1167 - we surveyed this one before offering two options. http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20060817-teamc/results I disagree with Gregg on this one. I think this is exactly the type of site that the exception in 2.2.1 was meant to cover. If we can't agree on this, then perhaps we need to think of a different example that is not controversial. LC-1168 - this was part of the aggregated content bucket. Is this resolved? Changed this one to [HOLD] too. LC-1169 assigned to Michael. I don't see any issues that would cause this one to be on hold. LC-1231 - don't know who worked on this one but it seems to be ready for surveying. I modified the response slightly. LC-1238 Proposal developed and discussed at Team C call. Actions to Michael and Becky. http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2006/07/10-wcag-teamc-minutes.html#item07 LC-1288 is a level change and is marked [HOLD]. So after all that, we now have 8 open issues in this category and 4 are on [HOLD]. Andi
Received on Monday, 13 November 2006 21:00:42 UTC