- From: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:59:44 +0000
- To: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- CC: "public-wcag-teamb@w3.org" <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
Sure, I agree zoom down is an important feature too. Actually I'm much less concerned now that I know it was an error and not a fundamental issue. In fact maybe its not even worth a note given that we are at least a year from rec. and I would hope to see the fix in the field in the same time-frame. Perhaps we can make a decision on what to say nearer the final drafting phase. Sean Hayes Standards and Policy Team Accessible Technology Group Microsoft Phone: mob +44 7977 455002 office +44 117 9719730 -----Original Message----- From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com] Sent: 19 January 2007 17:08 To: Sean Hayes Cc: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org Subject: Re: Zoom feature This makes it sound as if this behavior should be a user agent note for the uniform scaling technique. I don't think we want to change the SC because of a bug. The ability to scale down is also important for low vision users who are using screen magnifiers. Loretta On 1/18/07, Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com> wrote: > > I have been in touch with the IE folks over the zoom issue. It turns out that it is a known bug with positioned elements and they already have a fixed version which will be released in the next version of IE, however the release date of that is TBD. > > Since this only affects zoom less than 100%, and this provision is really about making text larger, I suggest we make the provision in the SC, "for enlargements up to 200%" (as I believe Gregg suggested). > > Sean Hayes > Standards and Policy Team > Accessible Technology Group > Microsoft > Phone: > mob +44 7977 455002 > office +44 117 9719730 > >
Received on Friday, 19 January 2007 18:00:00 UTC