- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:26:17 -0600
- To: "'Sean Hayes'" <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>, "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Cc: <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
I hope we are not "at least a year" from rec. But your point is good. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sean Hayes > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 12:00 PM > To: Loretta Guarino Reid > Cc: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org > Subject: RE: Zoom feature > > > Sure, I agree zoom down is an important feature too. > Actually I'm much less concerned now that I know it was an > error and not a fundamental issue. In fact maybe its not even > worth a note given that we are at least a year from rec. and > I would hope to see the fix in the field in the same > time-frame. Perhaps we can make a decision on what to say > nearer the final drafting phase. > > Sean Hayes > Standards and Policy Team > Accessible Technology Group > Microsoft > Phone: > mob +44 7977 455002 > office +44 117 9719730 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com] > Sent: 19 January 2007 17:08 > To: Sean Hayes > Cc: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org > Subject: Re: Zoom feature > > This makes it sound as if this behavior should be a user > agent note for the uniform scaling technique. I don't think > we want to change the SC because of a bug. The ability to > scale down is also important for low vision users who are > using screen magnifiers. > > Loretta > > On 1/18/07, Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > > I have been in touch with the IE folks over the zoom issue. > It turns out that it is a known bug with positioned elements > and they already have a fixed version which will be released > in the next version of IE, however the release date of that is TBD. > > > > Since this only affects zoom less than 100%, and this > provision is really about making text larger, I suggest we > make the provision in the SC, "for enlargements up to 200%" > (as I believe Gregg suggested). > > > > Sean Hayes > > Standards and Policy Team > > Accessible Technology Group > > Microsoft > > Phone: > > mob +44 7977 455002 > > office +44 117 9719730 > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 19 January 2007 22:26:37 UTC