- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 23:03:56 -0500
- To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lguarino@adobe.com>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <006c01c6df8e$7699f870$066fa8c0@NC6000BAK>
Hmmmm That is the number one complaint - and we always get grief for this SC. So I thought maybe it should be in the SC itself. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9> _____ From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 7:18 PM To: Gregg Vanderheiden; public-wcag-teamb@w3.org Subject: Re: proposal for 4.2.1 Can we address this issue in the definition of multiple versions of a Web unit? The definition says that all versions have the same content and functionality, which should imply that they are equally up to date. But we may want to add wording to the definition to make this explicit. On 9/23/06 3:47 PM, "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote: I think there was a strong desire to point out that it has to be up to date. So maybe When [multiple versions of a Web unit] are available, at least one version conforms at Level A and is most recent update. Any version that does not conform at Level A provides a mechanism to obtain an up to date version that does, and that mechanism meets all Level 1 success criteria. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9> <http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9> _____ From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] <mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org%5d> On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 3:16 AM To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org Subject: proposal for 4.2.1 Based on today's discussion and Greg's stab, here is another proposal for wording SC 4.2.1: When [multiple versions of a Web unit] are available, at least one version conforms at Level A. Any version that does not conform at Level A provides a mechanism to obtain a version that does, and that mechanism meets all Level 1 success criteria. Glossary entry: multiple versions of a Web unit: Web units in the same natural language that provide all of the same information and functionality <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/> Is this getting any closer? Loretta Guarino Reid lguarino@adobe.com Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering
Received on Sunday, 24 September 2006 04:04:13 UTC