Re: proposal for 4.2.1

Can we address this issue in the definition of multiple versions of a Web
unit? The definition says that all versions have the same content and
functionality, which should imply that they are equally up to date. But we
may want to add wording to the definition to make this explicit.

On 9/23/06 3:47 PM, "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote:

> I think there was a strong desire to point out that it has to be up to date.
> So maybe
>  
> 
> When [multiple versions of a Web unit] are available, at least one version
> conforms at Level A and is most recent update. Any version that does not
> conform at Level A provides a mechanism to obtain an up to date version that
> does, and that mechanism meets all Level 1 success criteria.
> 
> 
> Gregg
> 
>  -- ------------------------------
> Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
> Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
> Director - Trace R & D Center
> University of Wisconsin-Madison
> The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b
> <http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9>
> 
> 
> From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 3:16 AM
> To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org
> Subject: proposal for 4.2.1
>  
> Based on today¹s discussion and Greg¹s stab, here is another proposal for
> wording SC 4.2.1:
> 
>  
> When [multiple versions of a Web unit] are available, at least one version
> conforms at Level A. Any version that does not conform at Level A  provides a
> mechanism to obtain a version that does, and that mechanism meets all Level 1
> success criteria.
> 
> Glossary entry:
> 
> multiple versions of a Web unit:
> 
> Web units in the same natural language that provide all of the same
> information and functionality <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/>
> 
>  
> Is this getting any closer?
> 
> Loretta Guarino Reid
> 
> lguarino@adobe.com
> 
> Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering
>