- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:17:52 -0800
- To: "public-wcag-teamc@w3.org" <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
------ Forwarded Message > From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com> > Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 06:56:09 -0800 > To: "public-wcag-teamc@w3.org" <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org> > Conversation: SC 2.2.5, LC 1048 and LC 1288 > Subject: SC 2.2.5, LC 1048 and LC 1288 > Resent-From: <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:57:01 +0000 > > > I have the assignment to write the response for why we are not changing the > level of SC 2.2.5, as requested in LC 1048 and LC 1288. We are keeping SC > 2.2.5 at level 3 because it cannot be met by all content. > > However, these comments seem to be asking specifically that automatic page > refreshes be prohibited at L1 or L2. I think that SC 2.2.1 would already > address automatic page refreshes. Is my understanding correct? Should we add > this situation as a common failure for 2.2.1? > > Loretta > > ------ End of Forwarded Message
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2006 16:51:22 UTC