- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:24:14 -0600
- To: "Yvette Hoitink" <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
Thanks, Yvette! I think use of semantic elements such as <code>, etc., might be sufficient technique for SC 1.3.3 (information conveyed through variations in presentation of text). Typically, documentation presents code examples, expected user input, expected output, etc., in a different font than the body text, and for a sighted user the font-change conveys the information that the text presents a different type of content than the body text. (Many technical documents include prefatory material describing the formatting conventions used in the text.) Thoughts? John "Good design is accessible design." John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ -----Original Message----- From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yvette Hoitink Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:34 am To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org Subject: Action item: HTML technique for using appropriate semantic elements I took an action item to write an HTML technique to use the appropriate semantic elements to mark up the structure. My proposal can be found in the attachment. Originally, I had proposed writing this technique to cover other, less known, semantic elements like KBD, ADDRESS, etc. However, these elements do not seem to meet our definition of structure so do not belong as techniques for 1.3.1. What bothers me about this is that these using these elements does not seem to be required by any of our success criteria. I would like to discuss that during the call tonight. I think we either need to revise our definition of structure or need another success criterion about using semantic markup. As it stands, the only elements I could find that were about structure as we defined it but not covered by other techniques yet were <link> and <a> so I used these in the examples. Yvette Hoitink Heritas, Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands E-mail: y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl WWW: http://www.heritas.nl
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:24:26 UTC