- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:39:30 -0800
- To: "John M Slatin" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
Do we need to identify the techniques that have been accepted? There are a number of links to very rough technique documents for SC that already meet the minimum requirements for Last Call. Loretta Guarino Reid lguarino@adobe.com Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering > -----Original Message----- > From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org [mailto:public- > wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John M Slatin > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 2:21 PM > To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org > Subject: Updating Last Call Task List tables in WIKI > > > On the Editors' call today, Ben and Gregg asked us to make > sure that our > lists of Last Call tasks are up to date. This will help > Ben put together > materials for the techniques drafting marathon, to make > sure there's no > duplication of effort. > > For example, if category 1 issues in the table have been > closed by the > Working Group or techniques have been accepted, etc., the > table should > show that. > > There should also be a notation to show items that have > been included in > a survey but haven't yet been accepted by the Working > Group. > > Becky is going to move the table for 1.3 tasks into the > WIKI, so all > four of our tables will be linked from the Team B page. > > > Thanks! > > John > > > > > "Good design is accessible design." > John Slatin, Ph.D. > Director, Accessibility Institute > University of Texas at Austin > FAC 248C > 1 University Station G9600 > Austin, TX 78712 > ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 > email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu > web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 22:38:03 UTC