Re: updated plain text techniques

Lisa, it looks as if you only sent this response to me, although you ask a
question of the group.

I¹m not sure what our question is asking about. Are you asking whether one
of the proposed plain text techniques is sufficient? I have the feeling that
you have a particular scenario in mind. Perhaps discussing it will help us
tell whether or not we are going in the right direction.

Loretta


On 2/13/06 11:27 PM, "Lisa Seeman" <lisa@ubaccess.com> wrote:

> Oh dear
>  
> Of the list...Did the working group have any proof for thinking this is
> sufficient?
>  
> Oh well
> Lisa
>>  
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>  
>> From:  Loretta Guarino  Reid <mailto:lguarino@adobe.com>
>>  
>> To: Lisa Seeman <mailto:lisa@ubaccess.com>  ; public-wcag-teamb@w3.org
>>  
>> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 7:12  PM
>>  
>> Subject: Re: updated plain text  techniques
>>  
>> 
>> The techniques listed in the How To documents are  sufficient, in the opinion
>> of the working group. But we don¹t claim that they  are a complete list, that
>> is, there may be other techniques to satisfy the  success criterion. If an
>> author wants to use a different technique, however,  he has the
>> responsibility of demonstrating why it satisfies the success  criterion.
>> 
>> So, by listing the format suggested by the tests, the  working group is
>> saying that it is an accepted way to indicate structure in  text documents.
>> But there may be other ways.
>> 
>> 
>> On 2/13/06 8:51 AM,  "Lisa Seeman" <lisa@ubaccess.com> wrote:
>> 
>>  
>>> Sorry I have been  out of things a bit. I am under the weather.
>>> I am afraid I am lost. Are  you suggesting that documents should have the
>>> formats suggested by the  tests? (such as two blank  lines preceding the
>>> heading) Or just that they have a consistent  presentation -what ever that
>>> is?
>>>  
>>> All the best
>>> Lisa  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>  
>>>> From:  Loretta Guarino  Reid <mailto:lguarino@adobe.com>
>>>>  
>>>> To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org
>>>>  
>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 3:31   AM
>>>>  
>>>> Subject: updated plain text   techniques
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> I¹ve updated the plain text techniques, based on the comments   in the
>>>> survey and on the decision from the  teleconference.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Using_standard_text_formatt
>>>> ing_conventions_for_paragraphs
>>>> <http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Using_standard_text_format
>>>> ting_conventions_for_paragraphs>
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Using_standard_text_formatt
>>>> ing_conventions_for_lists
>>>> <http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Using_standard_text_format
>>>> ting_conventions_for_lists>
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Using_standard_text_formatt
>>>> ing_conventions_for_headings
>>>> <http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Using_standard_text_format
>>>> ting_conventions_for_headings>
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> Loretta Guarino   Reid
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> lguarino@adobe.com
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> Adobe   Systems, Acrobat Engineering
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>