RE: Notes on Wiki Cleanup

I've been doing some general clean-up of our wiki pages over the
weekend. I think I have addressed the following tasks from the Wiki
Cleanup for all of our GLs:

General:

- Have survey comments been incorporated? DONE (several are still
awaiting commenter approval)
- Has the draft been approved for publication? DONE 

How to Meet:

- Is the SC numbering consistent with the latest guidelines draft? DONE
- Is the string, "[DRAFT]" included before each link to techniques that
have not been approved/completed for publication? DONE
- Does the How to Meet document include up-to-date Technique titles?
DONE
- Is there at least one sufficient technique for each situation ready
for publication? DONE
- Are all listed failures ready for publication? UNPOPULATED FAILURES
IDENTIFIED

Techniques:

- Do the headings match those in the Techniques Template? DONE
- Is the technique categorized correctly [2] (ex. [[Category:Tech
Techniques]])? DONE

John has reviewed GL 3.1. We still need to review the following items
for GL 1.3 and 2.4:

General:

- Have inline comments been removed?
- Are there links to techniques or how to meet documents that should be
deleted?
- Are there any spelling, punctuation or grammatical mistakes or broken
links that need to be fixed?

I have also created several new pages in our Team B Work Area, to track
techniques and failures listed on one of our pages that are not
populated. I created separate pages for Failures, Sufficient Techniques,
and Advisory Techniques.

Loretta Guarino Reid
lguarino@adobe.com
Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John M Slatin
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 11:04 AM
> To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org
> Subject: FW: Notes on Wiki Cleanup
> 
> 
> Hi, all.
> 
> Ben is asking for our help in making sure that the documents 
> in the WIKI are truly ready for conversion to XML. He's 
> created a checklist (in the message below) of items we need 
> to check. There are three categories:
> 
> General stuff
> How to Meet documents
> Techniques and Failures
> 
> We're in pretty good shape on these things, but this is a 
> useful list and it will be good for us to go through the 
> documents again just tomake sure.
> 
> Ben will be using an automated conversion process to convert 
> these documents from WIKI to XML. The automation isn't smart 
> enough to fix our mistakes, so we need to do what we can to 
> help it along.
> 
> Before our Team B call on Tuesday (4 April), I'll review the 
> documents related to GL 3.1 against Ben's checklist. Can 
> anyone do the same for GL
> 2.4 and 1.3?
> 
> Thanks!
> John
> 
> 
> 
> "Good design is accessible design." 
> John Slatin, Ph.D.
> Director, Accessibility Institute
> University of Texas at Austin
> FAC 248C
> 1 University Station G9600
> Austin, TX 78712
> ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
> email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
> web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Caldwell [mailto:caldwell@trace.wisc.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 11:52 am
> To: Gregg Vanderheiden; 'John M Slatin'
> Subject: Notes on Wiki Cleanup
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> Here's a start for a wiki cleanup checklist that I'd like to 
> get some help from teams a, b and c on. I'm hoping that the 
> more we can do to have the wiki in the best shape possible 
> before I start the conversion to XML, the more smoothly and 
> quickly everything will be ready for publication.
> 
> General:
> 
> - Have survey comments been incorporated?
> - Has the draft been approved for publication?
> - Have inline comments been removed?
> - Are there links to techniques or how to meet documents that 
> should be deleted?
> - Are there any spelling, punctuation or grammatical mistakes 
> or broken links that need to be fixed?
> 
> How to Meet:
> 
> - Is the SC numbering consistent with the latest guidelines draft?
> - Is the string, "[DRAFT]" included before each link to 
> techniques that have not been approved/completed for 
> publication? (Note this is a new requirement that the 
> Wiki2XML converter will use to determine whether a link 
> should be active or not)
> - Does the How to Meet document include up-to-date Technique titles?
> - Is there at least one sufficient technique for each 
> situation ready for publication?
> - Are all listed failures ready for publication?
> 
> Techniques:
> 
> - Do the headings match those in the Techniques Template [1]?
> - Is the technique categorized correctly [2] (ex. 
> [[Category:Tech Techniques]])?
> 
> Anything to add? I'd really appreciate any help I can get in 
> getting through this as I need to be able to focus on the XML 
> and XSLT in order for us to wrap this up ASAP.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Ben
> 
> [1] http://tinyurl.com/dgcd7
> [2] http://tinyurl.com/qppeq
> 
> --
> Ben Caldwell | <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu> Trace Research and 
> Development Center <http://trace.wisc.edu>
> 
>

Received on Monday, 3 April 2006 18:01:25 UTC