- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:54:15 -0500
- To: <public-wcag-teama@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <001a01c67911$bf6303a0$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>
Comment
# 5
Jason White 5/2/2006
W2
Conformance
ED
"If individual authored units do not carry a conformance claim, then the
claim must be based on the Web unit with the authored units in place."
This is expressed in terms of claims rather than in terms of
conformance. It should be more accurately stated thus:
"If individual authored units do not carry conformance claims, then the
conformance of any Web units in which they occur is determined as the level
of conformance, if any, attained by those Web units with all aggregated
content in place".
"See wording proposed above [in COMMENT]"
Suggested resolution
Accept
Adopting a shorter wording however as follows.
"If individual authored units do not carry conformance claims, then the
conformance of any Web units in which they occur is determined by those Web
units with all aggregated content in place".
Gregg
------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center
University of Wisconsin-Madison
< <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848
The Player for my DSS sound file is at <http://tinyurl.com/dho6b>
http://tinyurl.com/dho6b
<http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2006 17:54:36 UTC