- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:54:15 -0500
- To: <public-wcag-teama@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <001a01c67911$bf6303a0$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>
Comment # 5 Jason White 5/2/2006 W2 Conformance ED "If individual authored units do not carry a conformance claim, then the claim must be based on the Web unit with the authored units in place." This is expressed in terms of claims rather than in terms of conformance. It should be more accurately stated thus: "If individual authored units do not carry conformance claims, then the conformance of any Web units in which they occur is determined as the level of conformance, if any, attained by those Web units with all aggregated content in place". "See wording proposed above [in COMMENT]" Suggested resolution Accept Adopting a shorter wording however as follows. "If individual authored units do not carry conformance claims, then the conformance of any Web units in which they occur is determined by those Web units with all aggregated content in place". Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison < <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 The Player for my DSS sound file is at <http://tinyurl.com/dho6b> http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2006 17:54:36 UTC