RE: Item for tomorrow.

We forgot to cover this last Tuesday.

 

Lets be sure to bring up next Tuesday 

 


Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 
The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b
<http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9>  

 

 


  _____  


From: public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bailey, Bruce
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 2:20 PM
To: public-wcag-teama@w3.org
Subject: RE: Item for tomorrow.

This also ties into the recent observation that it may be okay for the
regular audio track being okay as an audio description.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:00 AM
To: public-wcag-teama@w3.org
Subject: Item for tomorrow.

 

There was some question about an extended audio description being ok as an
audio description. So how about we:

 

1)       have all the 1.2.6 sufficient techniques be sufficient techniques
for 1.2.2 and 1.2.3

2)       Add the following to 1.2.6 as sufficient:             

*         Providing regular audio descriptions if there is no need for
extended audio descriptions.

OR

*         NOTE: if no extended audio descriptions are needed then this SC
does not apply.  


Gregg