RE: Item for tomorrow.

This also ties into the recent observation that it may be okay for the regular audio track being okay as an audio description.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:00 AM
To: public-wcag-teama@w3.org
Subject: Item for tomorrow.


 

There was some question about an extended audio description being ok as an audio description. So how about we:

 

1)       have all the 1.2.6 sufficient techniques be sufficient techniques for 1.2.2 and 1.2.3

2)       Add the following to 1.2.6 as sufficient:             

*         Providing regular audio descriptions if there is no need for extended audio descriptions.

OR

*         NOTE: if no extended audio descriptions are needed then this SC does not apply.   


Gregg