- From: Li, Alex <alex.li@sap.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:36:46 -0800
- To: <public-wcag-teama@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <6D259B2A9E733043B2D8567C82C2FEF91E2E98AF@uspalx23.pal.sap.corp>
3.2.1 Common Failures- <http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Failure_due_to_opening_ a_new_window_as_soon_as_a_new_page_is_loaded> Failure due to opening a new window as soon as a new page is loaded. Does this somehow suggest that techniques that are supposed to open multiple windows would fail L1 if they open these windows sequentially? I don't think the failure should be triggered by page load. The SC says that the trigger should be focus receive. I believe focus receive only include those that are user initiated. In environments where multiple scripting and programming technologies are involved (Java script is used to trigger an Active X application, then trigger a Java application, for example), it may be necessary to open windows in a sequential manner when the user wants to trigger a business process. Alternatively, a dthml version of arrange windows tile of a spreadsheet would involved opening multiple windows by user decision. Should we exclude the capability to do so in a sequential manner? It may be necessary to do so due to load management. If no user interaction is needed in these pop-ups opening sequence, I don't think this "failure" would confuse the user. Failure <http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Failure_due_to_opening_ a_pop-up_when_a_user_enters_text_into_an_input_field&action=edit> due to opening a pop-up when a user enters text into an input field - Please leave room for DOS or UNIX command prompt type functionalities. In other words, the return or enter key may trigger a change of context at least under some circumstances for good reasons. Failure <http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Failure_due_to_using_me ta_refresh> due to using meta refresh - We should either specify that such update don't always constitute a change of context because only part of the content is refreshed (stock price, wind speed, for example) or, better yet, have a separate page to help people understand what constitute as change of context. Should we consider providing something to help people differenciate when to apply 1.1 vs 1.2? Alex Li Manager, Accessibility Standards and Policies SAP Labs, Inc. 3410 Hillview Ave Palo Alto, CA 94304 T (650) 687-4770 F (610) 492-2961 M (202) 492-4592 mailto: <mailto:alex.li@sap.com> alex.li@sap.com http://www.sap.com <http://www.sap.com/> THE BEST-RUN BUSINESSES RUN SAP This e-mail is confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee it may be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information in this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately.
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:42:40 UTC