- From: WBS Mailer on behalf of db@deque.com <webmaster@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 22:42:01 +0000
- To: public-wcag-em-comments@w3.org,shadi@w3.org,e.velleman@accessibility.nl
The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Approval for draft publication of WCAG-EM' (public) for Denis Boudreau. --------------------------------- Abstract ---- * (x) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Introduction ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) I am wondering if the white-box, black-box, grey-box testing mention is relevant. Second sentence is long and weird: "This methodology, the Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) 1.0, describes the steps that are common to website conformance evaluation processes and highlights considerations that evaluators to apply these steps in the context of a particular website." I would change for the following: "The Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) 1.0 describes the steps that are common to website conformance evaluation processes. It highlights considerations that evaluators need to take into account to apply these steps in the context of a particular website." Remove the "to" in the third sentence: "Following this methodology will help evaluators apply good practice, avoid commonly made mistakes, and achieve more comparable results." --------------------------------- Using This Methodology ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Scope of Applicability ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Step 1: Define the Evaluation Scope ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Step 2: Explore the Target Website ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Step 3: Select a Representative Sample ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Step 4: Audit the Selected Sample ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Step 5: Record the Evaluation Findings ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) These answers were last modified on 12 December 2013 at 22:40:25 U.T.C. by Denis Boudreau Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/WCAG-EM-20131129/ until 2013-12-17. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 22:42:03 UTC