Hi all,
As mentioned on the call, I think we need some sort of 'beta' or
'experimental' flag we can use, so that we can publish rules that we think
are ready for implementation, but that don't have sufficient implementation
just yet.
Another key part that we discussed previously, which I don't see reflected
in this proposal yet is the idea that implementers would commit themselves
to sharing new test cases related to the common rules they implement. Only
if we have organizations actively sharing their 'edge cases', will we get
the feedback we need to keep iterating over these rules. We need to have a
feedback cycle to ensure we can keep rules accurate and current.
Wilco
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote:
> Dear ACT TF,
>
> Ref: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/conformance-testing/
> wiki/ACT_Review_Process
>
> As discussed during the call today, please review the outline for the
> proposed ACT Review Process. Feel free to add your feedback to the wiki
> discussion tab or by email.
>
> Regards,
> Shadi
>
> --
> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
> Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist
> Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
>
>
--
*Wilco Fiers*
Senior Accessibility Engineer - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair Auto-WCAG
