- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:19:15 +0100
- To: Markel Vigo <markel.vigo@manchester.ac.uk>
- CC: RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4F576E63.4050307@w3.org>
Excellent work o great editors! Attached a version with mostly minor (and rather pedantic) editorial suggestions. Take or leave at your pleasure... Two main issues though: #1. Needed before publication: an Abstract and also a sentence or two about what you would want reviewers of the draft to focus on; #2. After this first publication: I think the taxonomy for "validity", "reliability", etc is rather confusing and needs further work. Regards, Shadi On 6.3.2012 13:20, Markel Vigo wrote: > Hi there, > > The updated research note addresses all the comments raised in the recent meetings. Major changes are highlighted so that you can check them out. > > Find it available at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3976331/research-note-2012-03-6.odt > > Kind regards, > > Markel Vigo > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > University of Manchester (UK) > Web Ergonomics Lab - Information Management Group > > PS: I check my email at 9AM and 5PM BST. If you require a faster response please include the word [fast!] in the subject line. > > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Attachments
- application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text attachment: research-note-2012-03-6_saz.odt
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 14:19:47 UTC