- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:12:43 +0200
- To: Markel Vigo <markel.vigo@manchester.ac.uk>, giorgio brajnik <brajnik@uniud.it>, Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- CC: Simon Harper <Simon.Harper@manchester.ac.uk>, RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
Hi All, Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics/note/ED-metrics#proceedings> Currently we use the BibTex entry @article for the Research Report and @inproceedings for the individual papers contributed to us. These two are currently not directly related from the BibTex information. Would it be a good idea to change @article to @incollection? It could make the Research Report an independent part of the Proceedings. Also the "series" field could be used instead of the "journal" to indicate that this Research Report is one in a series of hopefully many. Does this make sense and is this a normal use of BibTex? Thanks, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Monday, 2 July 2012 15:13:12 UTC