- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:46:53 +0100
- To: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- CC: RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
Hi Josh, On 23.2.2012 09:40, Joshue O Connor wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm a little confused about what the issue is. Quality seems to be a > part of it but also it seems to be how we present the papers that we do > accept? I agree with Simon that if we accept a paper, we accept a paper. > So it should be a full citizen, and referenced in the normal manner. > > This is an incentive for people to submit. I don't think publication is being challenged. I think we all agree that all accepted papers will be published as part of the proceedings (in a referencable form and with a permanent URI). The question is if we then also need to always include these same papers as appendices to the consolidated WG Note. Best, Shadi > Cheers > > Josh > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 08:47:28 UTC