- From: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:02:10 +0100 (CET)
- To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org, evelleman@bartimeus.nl
Hi Eric, The way your mail was phrased sounded to me as if this was now going to be *the* 'open for all (accessibility people)' test run. If there is little time left, I think it is usefuld to invite to an open survey with a free choice of website at the same time as conducting the survey of the selected site - all that is n eeded is in place, the survey just needing a change in just one spot (provide the option enter a site rather thna point to the selected site). Having *two* open surveys (one focused on the site selected, the other with free choice of site) might confuse users. Since we will be talking today anyway, I was a bit surprised by this mail to all, with an invitation to distribute widely hours before the telco where we had agreed to take a decision on the best way to publicly evaluate WCAG-EM. Talk to you later, Detlev -- Detlev Fischer testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg Mobil +49 (0)1577 170 73 84 Tel +49 (0)40 439 10 68-3 Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5 http://www.testkreis.de Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites Velleman, Eric schrieb am 13.03.2014 12:10: > Hi Detlev, > > We proposed that we would put this on the agenda for our telco today and > proceed with the proposed 4H website in the meantime. Today we will discuss if, > when and how we want to open up a (separate) and more open survey where people > can choose or use their own website for evaluation. > > Kindest regards, > > Eric > > ________________________________________ > Van: Detlev Fischer [detlev.fischer@testkreis.de] > Verzonden: donderdag 13 maart 2014 12:01 > Aan: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org; Velleman, Eric > Onderwerp: Re: Open invitation to test-run WCAG-EM > > Hello Eric, > > What happened to the idea to let evaluators pick any site they like to > evaluate, to get a nice range of different websites? Is this a draft still to > be confirmed or possibly changed in today's telco? > > I think it would be highly desirable to get feedback, for example, on using > WCA-EM on web-apps even if that doesn't add to the (comparable) test results > for the one site identified in the online survey. > > Best, > Detlev > > -- > Detlev Fischer > testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese > Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg > > Mobil +49 (0)1577 170 73 84 > Tel +49 (0)40 439 10 68-3 > Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5 > > http://www.testkreis.de > Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites > > Velleman, Eric schrieb am 13.03.2014 11:41: > >> Dear all, >> >> Eval Task Force invites organizations and persons who (professionally) >> evaluate >> websites for WCAG 2.0 to test-run the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines >> Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM 1.0 Public Working Draft) at: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-EM/ >> >> We ask you to evaluate a full website using WCAG-EM and providing your input >> through a survey. The website for the test-run is listed in the survey. For >> the >> reporting (both on the evaluation and on the use and clarity of the evaluation >> methodology, we ask you to input your results into the survey at: >> https://utwentebs.eu.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cGAAMLdmjk3FmHX >> by *10 april 2014* >> >> Please note that this evaluation could take several hours or days depending on >> your workflow. The data will be treated as confidential and used to analyze >> improvements to WCAG-EM. Data you provide will always be anonymous. >> >> Overview: >> WCAG-EM describes an approach for evaluating how websites -- including web >> applications and websites for mobile devices -- conform to Web Content >> Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. It covers different situations, including >> self-assessment and third-party evaluation. It is independent of particular >> evaluation tools, web browsers, and assistive technologies. >> >> Additional questions: >> You can send any additional comments or questions about this test-run of >> WCAG-EM to the publicly archived mailing list: >> public-wai-evaltf@w3.org >> >> Background: >> WCAG-EM is developed by the WCAG 2.0 Evaluation Methodology Task Force (Eval >> TF), a joint task force of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working >> Group (WCAG WG) and Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG). The >> Eval TF is introduced at: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2011/eval/eval-tf>. >> It is a supporting resource for WCAG 2.0 and does not replace or supersede it >> in any way. For an overview of WCAG, see <http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag> >> This work is developed with support of the EC-funded WAI-ACT Project (IST >> 287725) described at: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ACT/> >> It is part of W3C WAI activities on web accessibility evaluation and testing >> introduced at: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2011/eval/> >> >> URI: >> The first URI above goes to the latest version of the document. The "dated" >> version of this draft is: <http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-WCAG-EM-20140130/> >> The difference between these URIs are explained in Referencing and Linking to >> WAI Guidelines and Technical Documents at: >> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/linking.html> >> >> Please let us know if you have any questions. Thank you in advance for >> participating in this evaluation test-run. >> Feel free to circulate this message to other lists, but also to other >> organizations and persons who professionally evaluate websites for WCAG 2.0; >> please avoid cross-postings where possible. >> >> Regards, >> Eric Velleman, Eval TF Facilitator >> Shadi Abou-Zahra, W3C/WAI Staff Contact >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2014 12:02:37 UTC