RE: what to do after 10 evaluations

+1

Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
Patrono y Directora General
Fundación Sidar - Acceso Universal
Email: coordina@sidar.org
Personal: Emmanuelle@sidar.org
Web: http://sidar.org


-----Mensaje original-----
De: Shadi Abou-Zahra [mailto:shadi@w3.org] 
Enviado el: lunes, 10 de marzo de 2014 13:59
Para: Detlev Fischer
CC: Velleman, Eric; public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Asunto: Re: what to do after 10 evaluations

So, the proposal would be that Eval TF evaluates the same one website, and
we invite external people to provide any additional feedback from evaluating
any other website they choose?

Best,
   Shadi


On 10.3.2014 10:31, Detlev Fischer wrote:
> Hi Shadi,
> as I said, I think a direct comparison is fine too (as planned) and the
open evaluation should not replace it. The open test run would be additional
and independent (as outlined).
>
> Detlev
>
> On 10 Mar 2014, at 09:58, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>
>> The down side is that we would then not have directly comparable
evaluation results.
>

--
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI
International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT
WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)

Received on Monday, 10 March 2014 14:54:53 UTC