- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:59:25 +0100
- To: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
- CC: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>, "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
So, the proposal would be that Eval TF evaluates the same one website, and we invite external people to provide any additional feedback from evaluating any other website they choose? Best, Shadi On 10.3.2014 10:31, Detlev Fischer wrote: > Hi Shadi, > as I said, I think a direct comparison is fine too (as planned) and the open evaluation should not replace it. The open test run would be additional and independent (as outlined). > > Detlev > > On 10 Mar 2014, at 09:58, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > >> The down side is that we would then not have directly comparable evaluation results. > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Monday, 10 March 2014 12:59:58 UTC