Re: [feedback sought] proposal to move sections in WCAG-EM

+1

* katie *

Katie Haritos-Shea @ GMAIL
On Jun 11, 2014 10:38 PM, "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org> wrote:

> Dear Eval TF,
>
> While working on the final Editor Draft of WCAG-EM it occurred to me that
> reorganization of a few sections could lead to better clarity of the
> document. In particular:
>  - Step 1.d (define evaluation procedures) seems more related to the use
> of techniques (or other methods) during evaluation (i.e. Step 4) than to
> Step 1.
>  - Similarly, Step 3.d (include complete processes) seems more related to
> the evaluation than the sampling. In fact, it can be directly merged with
> Step 4.b (check for complete processes).
>  - Steps 3.a, 3.b, and 3.c could be also merged together into a new
> section called "Select a structured sample" with a complimentary step
> "Generate a randomly selected sample" (we can tweak the titles).
>  - We had also discussed combining Step 4.a (check for each success
> criterion) and Step 4.c (check for accessible alternatives). The
> information from Step 1.d fits nicely with these two sections.
>
> I would like to discuss this reorganization (through which none of the
> current guidance will be lost) with you during tomorrow's call.
>
> Feel free to send any initial thoughts to the list too.
>
> Regards,
>   Shadi
>
> --
> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
> Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
> Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
> Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
>
>