Re: WCAG-EM: Sampling Sizes

Should ne an idea to identify the 10 most viewed pages via web site
statistics logs, then identify the path for reach them from home page and
test the pages .then identify the 3 or 5 main tasks for web site and do
similar evalutation.
Il 17/gen/2014 08:08 "WebKeyIT" <v.conway@webkeyit.com> ha scritto:

> Hi all
>
> I thought I'd start off this discussion about the sampling sizes.
>
> We talked about whether we should have a 'minimum' sample size.  This is a
> bit tricky for the wording because sometimes the whole website is the
> sample
> if its small and it might only be 5 static pages.  Therefore if we say a
> minimum of 10 pages, this website couldn't be evaluated under WCAG-EM.
>
> We might like to say a minimum of 10 pages unless the whole website is the
> sample in which case there would be no minimum.
>
> Sometimes we find that we're being able to do a discrete section of a
> website - such as the sample of the university library part of the whole
> university website.  In some cases this might be quite small, again making
> having a minimum of 10 pages might be a problem.
>
> Most of the time I find we need to do a minimum of 20 page in order to
> capture the items in the methodology - preferably 25.  Some organisations
> want every page (if they have lots of money), but most want to get the
> smallest page sample they can but still get the bases covered.  I agree
> that
> we need to make it clear that a single page could have many features - be
> part of a template, part of a complete process, have forms, images, and
> even
> multimedia examples.  You don't necessarily need each of these on 1 page
> each - that needs to be re-worded IMHO.
>
> Look forward to discussing this with the group.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Vivienne Conway, B.IT (Hons), MACS CT, AALIA(CS)
> Director
>
> Web Key IT Pty Ltd
> PO BOX 681 Wanneroo, WA 6946
> M    0415 383 673   F   (08) 9325 6422
>
> E      v.conway@webkeyit.com
> W    www.webkeyit.com
>
>
>
>
> This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the
> named addressee. It is confidential and may be subject to legal
> professional
> privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact me
> immediately by reply email, delete it from your system and destroy any
> copies. This email is subject to copyright, no part of it should be
> reproduced, adapted or transmitted without the prior written consent of the
> copyright owner. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
> individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Web Key IT
> Pty Ltd.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Velleman, Eric [mailto:evelleman@bartimeus.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, 16 January 2014 10:54 PM
> To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
> Subject: EvalTF Agenda
>
> Dear Eval TF,
>
> The next teleconference is scheduled for Thursday 16 January 2014 at:
>   * 15:00 to 16:00 UTC
>   * 15:00 to 16:00 UK Time
>   * 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time (time we use as reference)
>   * 10:00 to 11:00 North American Eastern Time (ET)
>   * 07:00 to 08:00 North American Pacific Time (PT)
>   * 23:00 to 24:00 Western Australia Time
>   * 02:00 to 03:00 Eastern Australia Time (Note: Friday)
>
> Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise date
> for your own time zone:
>   - <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>
>
> The teleconference information is: (Passcode 3825 - "EVAL")
>   * +1.617.761.6200
>   * SIP / VoIP -http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP
>
> We also use IRC to support the meeting: (http://irc.w3.org)
>   * IRC server: irc.w3.org
>   * port: 6665
>   * channel: #eval
>
>
> AGENDA:
>
> #1. Welcome
>
> #2. Walkthrough last version of document and output of WCAG WG discussion
>
> #3. Other issues
>
> EV
>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 17 January 2014 07:13:54 UTC