Re: Change title of Conformance in the context of WCAG-EM

Hi Eric and Shadi--

I wonder if the problem would be solved if we said  "a methodology for evaluating conformance"  rather than "additional guidance for conformance evaluation".

Mike


________________________________
 From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
To: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl> 
Cc: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org> 
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: Change title of Conformance in the context of WCAG-EM
 

Hi Eric,

I'd prefer if we could avoid using the word conformance at all. We do 
not (for good reasons) define conformance with WCAG-EM.

I don't have a specific wording suggestion but I can't help to wonder 
about the relationship between this section and the existing "Scope of 
this document" section. Maybe these sections can be combined, or this 
text can be included as a sub-section of the scope section?

Best,
   Shadi


On 9.9.2013 15:38, Velleman, Eric wrote:
> For discussion: In the current proposal, the title of the new section ("Conformance in the context of WCAG-EM") can be understood as redefining WCAG and that is not the intent. We could change to:
> - "Issues of conformance" or
> - "WCAG-EM conformance output" or
> - "Conformance in the context of Evaluation" or
> - "Your title here" :-)
>
> This discussion addresses: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20130903#conformanceintro
>
>

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)