Re: [for review] updated Methodology draft

Hi Shadi, Eric and TF,

This new draft looks a lot better.
There are a few spelling/grammar questions - but the overall concept is 
good. I believe that it is becoming a usable document. Well done you two.

I fear that I will not be back in time for the conference today - sorry - my 
apologies.

Regards
Richard

-----Original Message----- 
From: Shadi Abou-Zahra
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 9:22 PM
To: Eval TF
Subject: [for review] updated Methodology draft

Dear Eval TF,

Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120306>

As indicated by Eric, please find a new version of the Methodology for
your review. While it is considerably rewritten, many of the concepts
should not be new. Other sections, particularly section 2.1 and step 3
in section 3 introduce new approaches based on the feedback from the
group discussions that we will further discuss on Thursday.

Please feel free to send your thoughts and comments to the list ahead of
the teleconference call.

Regards,
   Shadi

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)

Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 14:37:54 UTC