- From: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@googlemail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:22:57 +0200
- To: "'Shadi Abou-Zahra'" <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Shadi, I think there is no need for categorizing each listed one in method, technique and methodology and also this could easily create a long debate. This is not my intention. I just thought that the proposed change of the title will be more open. Best Kerstin > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Shadi Abou-Zahra [mailto:shadi@w3.org] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2011 18:09 > An: Kerstin Probiesch > Cc: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > Betreff: Re: Wiki: "Website Accessibility Evaluation Methodologies" - > title > > Hi Kerstin, > > Yes, I thought about separating them out into different pages when we > have more entries. I'm not looking forward to categorization though... > > Best, > Shadi > > > On 27.10.2011 17:30, Kerstin Probiesch wrote: > > Hi TF, > > > > it seems to me, that not all "methodologies" on > > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Website_Accessibility_Evaluation_Methodol > ogies > > are really "methodologies". Some are "just" techniques or methods. > Therefore > > a title like "Website Accessibility Evaluation methods (or > techniques?) and > > methodologies" might be better. Or? > > > > > > Best > > > > Kerstin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ > Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office > Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) > Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2011 16:23:28 UTC