- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:57:45 +0200
- To: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- CC: Léonie Watson <lwatson@nomensa.com>, RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Josue, On 21.10.2011 13:49, Joshue O Connor wrote: > Hi Shadi, > >> The initial objective was to collect publicly documented evaluation >> methodologies that we can learn from for the development of a WCAG2 >> methodology. I'm not sure how such generic information supports this >> purpose. What precisely do you suggest adding to the wiki? > > I am talking just about expert evaluation in general, and wondering out > loud if such things are so readily defined for the web? I see a lot of > this stuff as 'work in progress'. In general, as I am sure you know, > expert evaluation comes out of the usability domain (and before that the > general ergonomics) and I guess there are variations on it based on > pre-existing heuristics. I do not think the maturity of a methodology is the issue but I think it should be publicly documented so that we can learn from it. I also agree we should be open to and learn from different approaches. > Anyway for example, regarding the Web there is the 'Unified Web > Evaluation Methodology' (i'm not sure if it is on the wiki yet, but if > not this would be a good addition). [1] Feel free to beat me to it, as a participant of RDWG you have full access to the wiki... ;) Best, Shadi > HTH > > Josh > > [1] http://www.wabcluster.org/uwem1_2/UWEM_1_2_CORE.pdf > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Friday, 21 October 2011 11:58:10 UTC