- From: <kvotis@iti.gr>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:28:23 +0300
- To: "Kerstin Probiesch" <k.probiesch@googlemail.com>
- Cc: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>, "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
i vote for WAEM > Hello TF, > > I think WAEM is ok cause it's the title. > > Regs > > Kerstin > > Via Mobile > > Am 13.10.2011 um 17:11 schrieb "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>: > >> Dear all, >> >> We decided in the call to discuss the short name in the list. Below are >> some short names from the discussions we had sofar and a proposed >> shortlist of requirements: >> >> Requirements for a short name: >> - It should be short >> - Easy to pronounce >> - Clear to all what it means (selfexplanatory) >> - Be about the methodology >> >> Shortnames (Make your choice or add new ones): >> - SiteAccess >> - WCAG-Method >> - WCAG-EM >> - WAEM (really using the title) >> - WCAG-Check >> - AccessSite >> - WCAG-Site >> - AccessCheck >> - SiteCheck >> - CheckSite >> - WAMBAM >> - WAME >> - MCEWA >> - CEWA >> - CEW2WCAG2 >> - UWEM >> - SITE >> - MAWA >> - MDWC >> - EWAMAC >> - EMAWC >> - WEM >> >> Kindest regards, >> >> Eric >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 06:29:03 UTC