- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:20:08 +0200
- To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: > Hi Carlos, > > Thank you for this suggestion. I've incorporated it except for the > owl:imports. According to the OWL specification, it says: > > - "An owl:imports statement references another OWL ontology containing > definitions, whose meaning is considered to be part of the meaning of > the importing ontology." > > I'm not sure that we actually want to *import* other namespaces. This > relates to Notes 5&6 about requiring support for HTTP-in-RDF and for > Content-in-RDF: > - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090610#note5> > - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090610#note6> > > Once we have a resolution on these points then we can update the RDF > accordingly. For now, I've added rdfs:seeAlso for cross-referencing. Can we add the imports and ask for comments by OWL people on that? -- Johannes Koch Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT Web Compliance Center Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628 Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 08:20:44 UTC