- From: Carlos A Velasco <carlos.velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:43:17 +0200
- To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi all, According to my action item from today, which I reworded. This is also related to ISSUE-17. I would suggest that we use in all our RDF Schemas the ontology headers: <http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#Ontology-def> For instance, for EARL 1.0: <owl:Ontology rdf:about=""> <owl:versionInfo>v 1.0</owl:versionInfo> <rdfs:comment>Schema for the Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 </rdfs:comment> <owl:imports rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"/> <!-- ... and all the imported namespaces here --> </owl:Ontology> Like the OWL spec recommends, I would like to suggest also to use the xml:base attribute, pointing to our namespaces, e.g.: xml:base="http://www.w3.org/ns/earl" regards, carlos -- Dr Carlos A Velasco Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT Web Compliance Center: http://webcc.fit.fraunhofer.de/ imergo®: http://imergo.com/ · http://imergo.de/ Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) Tel: +49-2241-142609 · Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2009 17:43:58 UTC