- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:03:06 +0100
- To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- CC: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi Johannes, Johannes Koch wrote: > > Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: > >> Carlos A Velasco wrote: > >>> 1) Whether we make the schema "pure" RDFS. We can eliminate the OWL >>> "thingies." We could make all instances from Outcome and TestMode simple >>> RDF Resources. >> >> I thought we had come to this conclusion but I may be wrong. > > On the one hand, the range of earl:outcome makes clear that every object > in a triple with an earl:outcome predicate is of type earl:Outcome. > However, for clarity, I would make "#cannotTell" et al. explicitly an > earl:Outcome, as it is in the version CarlosV sent. I don't know what you mean. Right now we have this line in each of the instances: <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing"/> However, since they are instances they are already of type Class. Does it add any useful information to say that they are also an owl:Thing? Best, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Friday, 14 November 2008 15:03:42 UTC