- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:48:28 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Dear group, First, please make sure you have read the summary of the issue in: [1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Aug/0012> We have discussed this issue again during the teleconference of 29 August [2] but with no definitive resolution. There are two specific questions to the group: #1. Any objections to dropping earl:Content in favor of http:Content? (these classes are redundant and should be merged *somewhere*) #2. Should http:Content be separated out from HTTP-in-RDF, for example in some other namespace? In another document too? Please voice your position now... Regards, Shadi [2] <http://www.w3.org/2007/08/29-er-minutes> -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 08:48:37 UTC