- From: Carlos A Velasco <Carlos.Velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:29:29 +0200
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi Shadi, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > > Dear group, > > First, please make sure you have read the summary of the issue in: > [1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Aug/0012> > > We have discussed this issue again during the teleconference of 29 > August [2] but with no definitive resolution. There are two specific > questions to the group: > > #1. Any objections to dropping earl:Content in favor of http:Content? > (these classes are redundant and should be merged *somewhere*) I object: there is earl:Content not necessarily fetched via HTTP. > #2. Should http:Content be separated out from HTTP-in-RDF, for example > in some other namespace? In another document too? Content must be in another namespace, and being consistent, in other document. regards, carlos -- Dr Carlos A Velasco Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT) BIKA Web Compliance Center - http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/ Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) Tel: +49-2241-142609 Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 09:30:06 UTC