- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:27:25 +0100
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- CC: WAI ER <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi Karl, Karl Dubost wrote: > Hi, > > When we do interoperability testing, there are two ways of presenting > the data. > > 1. list of test cases and one assertor tries all of them through one > software > 2. One test case that is tried by one assertor with regards to a list of > implementations. > > I would like to know what would be the most elegant way of doing the > second case. > > > * testcase-Z hosted at the uri http://example.org/test1 > * assertor with the name john smith and john@example.org > * software-A - pass > * software-B - pass > * software-C - fail We regard each of these as a separate test execution, and each result is recorded into an earl:TestResult. The relationship between the tests is actually part of the test case description rather than of an EARL report -for example, to express that "test-1", "test-2", and "test-3" are part of a single "interoperability test" is outside the scope of EARL. Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 17:27:41 UTC