- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 12:01:33 -0500
- To: WAI ER <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <373C25B6-7849-446C-835D-18D688972BFA@w3.org>
Hi, When we do interoperability testing, there are two ways of presenting the data. 1. list of test cases and one assertor tries all of them through one software 2. One test case that is tried by one assertor with regards to a list of implementations. I would like to know what would be the most elegant way of doing the second case. * testcase-Z hosted at the uri http://example.org/test1 * assertor with the name john smith and john@example.org * software-A - pass * software-B - pass * software-C - fail Could someone help me to finish (fix) it? <rdf:RDF xmlns:http="http://www.w3.org/2006/12/http#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:earl="http://www.w3.org/ns/earl#" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:base="http://www.example.org/earl/report#"> <earl:Assertion> <earl:test rdf:resource="#testcase-Z"/> <earl:assertedBy rdf:resource="#john" /> <earl:mode rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/earl#manual"/> </earl:Assertion> <foaf:Person rdf:nodeID="john"> <foaf:name>John Smith</foaf:name> <foaf:mbox rdf:resource="mailto:john@example.org"/> </foaf:Person> <earl:TestCase rdf:about="http://example.org/test1" rdf:nodeID="testcase-Z"> <dc:title xml:lang="en">Cool test</dc:title> <dc:description xml:lang="en">Test description of what I got</ dc:description> </earl:TestCase> <!-- Here missing the useful information for each software --> <earl:TestResult rdf:about="#result"> <earl:outcome rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/earl#pass"/> </earl:TestResult> </rdf:RDF> Thanks for the help -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 17:01:47 UTC