- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:47:27 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: > > Hi Johannes, > > Johannes Koch wrote: >> >> Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: >>> Or the ampersands need to be escaped in the XMLContent, and unescaped >>> back when putting the pieces of the XML document together again. So >>> " " would be temporarily recorded as "&nbsp;" within the >>> HTTP-in-RDF code, and tools will decoded back and forth as needed. >>> >>> What do you think of this approach? >> >> I don't think this is an XMLLiteral anymore. > > I looked at the definition for XMLLiteral [1] but can't say if this > approach breaks any of the requirements or not. Why do you think it > isn't an XMLLiteral anymore? > > [1] > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/#dfn-rdf-XMLLiteral> How do you distinguish between abc def and abc&nbsp;def when creating the XMLLiteral? How should a generic RDF application behave when dealing with <http:xmlRest rdf:parseType="Literal">abc&nbsp;def</http:xmlRest> ? -- Johannes Koch BIKA Web Compliance Center - Fraunhofer FIT Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628 Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 09:47:47 UTC