- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:26:52 +0200
- To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- CC: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi Johannes, Johannes Koch wrote: > > Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: >> Or the ampersands need to be escaped in the XMLContent, and unescaped >> back when putting the pieces of the XML document together again. So >> " " would be temporarily recorded as "&nbsp;" within the >> HTTP-in-RDF code, and tools will decoded back and forth as needed. >> >> What do you think of this approach? > > I don't think this is an XMLLiteral anymore. I looked at the definition for XMLLiteral [1] but can't say if this approach breaks any of the requirements or not. Why do you think it isn't an XMLLiteral anymore? [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/#dfn-rdf-XMLLiteral> Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 09:30:07 UTC