- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:04:19 +0100
- To: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>, Dan Brickley <danbrickley@gmail.com>
- Cc: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org, public-wai-ert@w3.org, Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetilk@opera.com>
Hi Phil, Danbri, Both foaf:Agent [2] and foaf:Organization [3] are marked unstable in the currently published FOAF Vocabulary Specification. ERT WG is requesting the FOAF folks (Danbri et al) to change the formal status of these terms if they deem this appropriate. It would help us to normatively reference (and depend!) on these terms in the EARL 1.0 Schema: - <http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/> [2] <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/#term_Agent> [3] <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/#term_Organization> Regards, Shadi Phil Archer wrote: > > > > > Yes, I believe it is stable. It's a subclass of foaf:Agent which is > itself stable. Unless I hear screams to the contrary, I think > foaf:Organization will appear in the POWDER recs [1]. > > Cheers > > Phil. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/ > > > Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >> Hi, >> >> it seems that foaf:Organization is actually pretty stable. It has been >> around a long time, and we would like to recommend it (and foaf:Agent >> and foaf:Person) as a preferred term in EARL [1]. But it would be >> easier if it were formally marked as stable... >> >> any chance? >> >> cheers >> >> Chaals >> > > > > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Monday, 26 February 2007 08:04:31 UTC