- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:20:32 +0200
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- CC: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi Jeremy, Thank you for providing these comments, they have been recorded here: - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues> Please let us know if you have further input, we will be processing these comments in the coming weeks. Regards, Shadi Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > > > I read at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-EARL10-Schema-20070323/#outcomevalue > [[ > (or subclasses of them) > ]] > (end of first para of section) > > This does not make sense: the values are not classes. > > I suggest deleting that text. > > == > Background: (not part of formal comment) > > I am using EARL to produce test reports for GRDDL tests. > My software being tested occasionally crashes :( > > I report: > earl:pass and earl:fail as appropriate, > and also earl:notApplicable (because some of the GRDDL tests come in > groups which require only one test to be passed) > > I was thinking that there might be an appropriate code, e.g. > earl:disaster, for reporting that my software crashed during the test. > There isn't. And for the purposes of testing, I guess the distinction > between earl:disaster and earl:fail is not important. So, if there was a > useful mechanism for extending earl:fail then I might use it. As is, > EARL allows me to add my own comment (e.g. earl:info) to the > earl:TestResult, so I don't see any need to suggest any other changes. > > Jeremy > > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Sunday, 29 April 2007 08:30:04 UTC