- From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:25:31 +0200
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>, <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
> > The Software class is designed to be generic and > stand-alone. For this > > reason it is not a subclass of the (currently not stable) > FOAF Agent > > class. However, there is a slight benefit of making it such > a subclass > > so that all SingleAssertor instances would effectively be > Agent types > > (and thus reusable in FOAF applications). > > > > How much of a benefit is it, versus how much stability > impact is there? > > I don't see a stability problem in practice. The question is > whether out use of e:Software is always a f:Agent. I am not > sure, at this stage. > Agree with Chaals on this, as I think it's related with the previous concerns I raised about it (all the "philosophical" discussion in the past). Regards, CI. -------------------------------------- Carlos Iglesias CTIC Foundation Science and Technology Park of Gijón 33203 - Gijón, Asturias, Spain phone: +34 984291212 fax: +34 984390612 email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 11:25:45 UTC