- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:12:23 +0100
- To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Cc: "public-wai-ert@w3.org" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi, If this class is optional (not burdening tool developers to implement yet another vocabulary), and if you are willing to do the editorial work, then it may be useful to have. However, I am afraid it would still require us to rethink the earl:uri property if we want it as a possible extension in EARL. What are the prose and cons, and what is the impact on the EARL 1.0 Schema if we decide to take this up? Regards, Shadi Johannes Koch wrote: > > Hi list, > > CarlosV just proposed another WG Note: URI in RDF. > > URI class > with properties: > * scheme > * user-info > * host > * port > * path > * query > * fragment > > It could be used in HTTP in RDF and elsewhere. -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2006 22:12:30 UTC